It's because many of those individuals feel the need to foist those ideas upon the rest of the fandom and then degrade those who disagree. I'm in the boat of enjoying the idea of being any one of my 'sonas, but for many reasons I've come to accept that I won't be. And I bet very few people here knew that simply because I'm not spouting it everywhere. And honestly, there was very little reason for you to assume Evna was talking to you. You haven't even been on or posting enough to make that kind of impression, nor does Evna know you very well. Feeling guilty?
Note the bold text, below.
Perhaps it is due to my combination of trans-Humanism and 'membership' within the furry community, that I am one such person that you're all speaking of.
I never said Evnamishko, nor any other individual in particular, had been specifically referring to me in their messages. So, honestly, there's very little reason for anyone to misconstrue (or perhaps intentionally twist) my words and then say I was somehow taking all these posts as personal attacks. I was just responding to the apparent consensus that people who believe furry should be more than a 'fandom' all stink and make the group look bad. I suppose I could have put it in a way like "I am one such person, being part of a 'furry extremist sect', the
latter of which you are all speaking of", but God is that unnecessary.
You know, I thought that the ideas that I and some others have would be impressive to most people within and without furry. Sure, there'd probably be at least some people who'll still think I'm a crazy asshole; plain trans-Humanists are sometimes considered dangerous and blasphemous already, so just add furry on top of that, plus my vigiliantism, interventionism, militarism, retributivism, imperialism... Actually, I still have hope to find like-minded people, because the recent posts of this thread make up just a tiny sliver of the whole community, and even including the entire forums would only be looking at a sample size.