Furkinis / male animal legs and the virtual content policy.

[Thagrahn]

I have no problem with the "Clothing is optional" view that some furries, but, as an access pass user, I can also see where the furkinis can be seen as a way around the access pass.

The real problem will be if to many human types start complaining about it.  (Although it would seem that IMVU is Furry dominated right now)

[Vosur Aekira]

Here's the situation simplified: If the furkini/anthrolegs show a 'part' that is Access Pass Only, then it is labled that. If it shows a 'part' that is Unfit for IMVU (I've actually yet to see one fit this example...) then it is labeled that. But if it just seems like it fits on the skin and gives a 'Bugs Bunny effect' to the skin, then it's General Audience.

To the individual users: If they report abuse for what you wearing a furkini/anthrolegs and nothing showing... then don't worry and make sure you let IMVU know that these items to not violate the ToS even if combined.

To the developers: If you start getting 'flags' on your furkinis or anthrolegs, by all means.... set up defenses for grief-flagging. ((which has been going on quite a bit lately.))

[[D.E.M] zetsumei]

im sorry if i sound like a n00b, but what are furkinis??

[ephemral]

FURkinies are swim wear made using the texture from a furry skin.
This aids in creating a clean cartoon look for the avatar.
You know how cartoons don't wear pants some times, but their
junk isn't showing.

[Serabee]

As long as there's nothing that's not on a Barbie (like you used in your example) I think it's fine. I mean, we have fur which technically could be called clothes. Plus, what if some human just wanted an... oddly patterened swimsuit? You never know...