Just wanted to know what everyone's thoughts were on the films.
Personally, as a huge fan of the books and a purist, I've found the films to be pretty hit or miss. 1 and 5 are my favorites, as I feel they are the truest to the source material. 3 and 4 are my least favorites. 3 because it felt like the director was more concerned with putting his own personal, stylistic stamp on the franchise than making an honestly faithful film. And I abhor movie 4. Not just because it should've been two films, but because it took by far the most liberties with the source material, choosing to focus more on amplifying the teen angst elements that are barely there in the book. And while I'm at it, I can't stand Michael Gambon as Dumbledor! I know the original Dumbledor died, so they had to replace him, but what drives me crazy is how Gambon portrayed the character, particularly in Movie 4. I mean, he starts yelling at Harry once his name comes out of the Goblet and then when he gets into the side room, he grabs Harry by the shoulders and practically shouts in his face!
I'm sorry, but that's just not Dumbledor.
Anyway, there are worse adaptations out there. The Resident Evil movies for example. On the whole, the Harry Potter adaptations are average in my mind. If they had waited until all the books had been released, and gotten one director to direct all the films, I'm sure things would have been better. That said, unlike other adaptations I've seen, the Harry Potter films stay true to the core story and most of the characters, so things could also have been A LOT worse. On the whole, the film series is an average adaptation. I've seen better, and I've seen worse.