Counting to 1,000,000

[George]

51,241
You make them sound like they opressed the users like some weird regime.

[White Wolf Guardian]

51242

Indirectly speaking, what was your choice? Either post with nothing, or post with them. Everyone had the last name "Coleo".

On that note, I really miss The Hill thread.

[George]

51.243
I can see what you mean, but it still sounded, for lack of a better word, silly the way you said it before.

I dunno what Hill thread even is, that's how gone it is.

[Trixsie Vixen]

51244


What was this Hill thread White?

[White Wolf Guardian]

51245
Hmm... well there is one way.

[George]

51.246
Was it...SILENT? *rimshot*

[Trixsie Vixen]

51247


Surely you can't mean.... Frankenthread!?

[George]

51.248
This should be interesting.

[White Wolf Guardian]

51249

Only staff can bring a thread back by the request of a user or staff can also bring threads back by asking themselves if they really want this. Well, I do.

http://www.thefurryforum.com/forums/index.php?topic=4446.msg1157659#msg1157659

[George]

51.250
Well, that was...I don't know what to call it even.

[White Wolf Guardian]

51251

>Last post 3 years ago.

>I killed it, because it was required before the rule revisions.

>Necro'd

[George]

51.252
Yes, but you threatened to close down the Million Count, a popular, active thread...


...and then you un-close a thread that was inactive for months at a time when it was still in style.

[White Wolf Guardian]

51253

> Question is why would after several warnings a thread have to be closed?

>The rules a long time ago were so that if a thread went inactive past 4 weeks, it was no longer allowed to be used.

>This is the time to strike back.

[George]

51.254
Excuse my saying, but the "power" seems to be giving you some new urges.

[White Wolf Guardian]

51255

Actually I've been wanting to either replace the thread or bring it back, since it is significant to the oldest users *considered not an old user* it seems more appropriate to bring the original.