well it's certainly imaginative. I love the idea of a chunks of planet orbitting a tiny sun (though when you called it a yellow dwarf, i totally got the wrong idea

) The science behind it is sketchy, and i'm guessing that the lands that dont move are either in total frozen darkness or constant blazing heat, so would have little to no life upon them. Either way it works and it's a good foundation and setting for the story. However, when you're talking about the world and its inhabitants, it sounds like a brochure. it's very matter of fact. Personally, i like to reveal things slowly as if they're completely normal, because to the characters, they are completely normal.
Once you get to the characters, there's a visible *clunk* between describing the world (brochure mode) and telling the story. The tone doesnt change massively, but you do change from present to past tense for no apparent reason, and you flit between the two from then on. It's also clunky because you drop in a character with not a single word to explain who she is. You just drop her in expecting everyone to either know her already or just accept everything you throw at them, including a daughter that totally threw me off, because it's such a throwaway comment as if we should already know this information. You seem to do this a lot, including not telling us what city she is in, or what landmass, which would be fine if you hadnt spent three paragraphs explaining the geography before hand.
I tend to see this type of thing a lot. People have these great ideas and good characters with personality, but they dont know the basics of storytelling to allow them to convey that to the audience. I mean the main problems you seem to have are:
Show dont tell: telling us the bare faced facts of what's going on isnt interesting. Show it to us through character action and interaction, as well as imagery and in depth description of the environment and characters.
Tenses: Stick to either present, past or future tense. Only change if you have a really good reason to. It's one of the main scaffolds to hold your story up. It's not beautiful but it's necessary.
Words in close proximity: Dont say the same word twice in on sentence, actually don't say the same word in two adjacent sentences. You did that quite a bit in sentences like "A number of disturbed fish splash away down the end of the lake away from the disturbance"
Relevant things in relevant places: the affect of the dragon on the wildlife should have been said while the dragon was still there, not afterwards. It's the literary equivalent of "I forgot to mention."
Dont clarify your sentences: If you're sentence needs clarifying, then the sentence needs to be re-written. Example of you clarifying: "Stepping into the muddy remains she covered herself in the healthy remains ((the mud)) and motioned to the dragon"
Imagery is your friend... but dont go crazy: "A number of the smaller parrots," smaller than what? and how small? small as a flea or a kitten... or a whale?
Really most of these are simple small mistakes that could be cleansed with one rule:
Re-read aloud: before you show anyone your stuff, re-read it aloud and make changes accordingly, or else you get mistakes like switching from saying "Miayuki" to saying "you."
it might cure some sentences like: "Green shimmering images of leaves play over its body, although you can tell its female as some of the leaves skip a beat"
I just... I just dont understand it.
But dont take this all as negative. You've got a good strong imagination that most people cant grasp. Your problems are merely technical and are easily fixed with practice.