But if there is no scientific evidence to proove the theory of an intelligent creator, by deductive [or is it inductive logic] is that not reason enough to dismiss the idea of divine creation as false?
No not really. Science is entirely separate from religion, it's a philosophy on life. You dismiss it in a scientific context, sure, you say "Science has found no evidence of a god", that's true, but science has found no evidence for a lot of things, it's found no evidence of any philosophy, it's found no evidence of any moral subjective choice, it's found no evidence of the human experience. For example, science can't prove that consciousness or self-awareness really exists, there is no scientific evidence, what-so-ever, that the people you talk to on a daily basis are conscious. We know that their frontal lobe probably activates, but we don't know if they're self-aware, we could all be zombies simply mimicking a person that is conscious, there is really no scientific reason to believe that people are actually conscious.
So because there is no scientific evidence to suggest people are self aware, do you not believe people are? Do you not believe that the people you talk to are in fact conscious people? Of course you do, but you don't believe that based on scientific principles, you believe that because of philosophical and moral principles. You've made a choice to believe other people in the world are conscious, there's no scientific reason to believe that, but you've made that choice anyway. Whether a god does or does not exist follows the same principle, there is no scientific evidence for or against a god, the question is quite literally outside the realm of science, so whether you believe a god exists or not is a choice you make, not a scientifically backed theory.
PS: It'd be inductive not deductive
