The Most Horrible Thing Ever

[Neverending Twilight]

Look what I found on DeviantArt when I was browsing the furry art. http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/14448198/?qo=23&q=furries&qh=boost%3Apopular+age_sigma%3A24h+age_scale%3A5

May all furry haters die horrible deaths.

[WhiteTiger147]

OMG!!  > I think that is horrible too but i would never wish someones death  

[ephemral]

The comments are more entertaining than the deviation itself. lol. Furry drama is the best.

That's my reply. The furres that took that seriously are more of a joke. :snicker:
I mean....sheesh.

[Goblin Cat 😸]

Some people can be so stupid. As Eph said, the furs who take it seriously are just giving the artist what they wanted.

[airraiser]

Meh do what I do, be indifferent. Cause for the most part if someone meets you IRL they are to scared to do it to your face. If they are not still act calm cause if they start anything MUAHAHA you can call the cops on their butt and you are scott free! Okay yes I am devious. But figure it this way everyone is entitled to their own opinion. Reguarless of how ignorant they are. Best to try and ignore them cause theire is no way of getting rid of them.

[ephemral]

I relay don't understand what people are so worked up about.
In the artist comments he only refers to furries in a way that can only be interpreted as
artistic depictions of fantasy and not the real life counterparts.

I guess people are just going to be up in arms even if most of their thinking is done with their posterior.

Post by Veriea

I have one major object to this.
Now, you are entitled to your opinions and are fully entitled to hate what you don't like. You are also entitled by freedom of speach and creative rights to place something like this on a public site.
My objection comes from you lumping both 'Furry' artists and 'Anthromorphic' artists together.
Anthromorphic cretures and those who draw them are not by defult 'Furrys'.
Furrys are, by definition, someone who dresses in a fur-suit or parts there of and acts as an animal, often in sexual situations, or who find the idea of animals or part-animals sexually stimulating.
Now, a Furry might find anthromorphs interesting in that particular way, but that does not make them or their artists Furrys.

I am not 'against' Furrys, nor am I 'for' them, though I am sickened by the idea of any sort of sexual relation in the way of Furrys and I am quite firmly aware that I am a human and nothing more, but I do draw Anthromorphs, though not exclusively, simply because I am better at drawing animals than humans and am more inclined towards the fantasy/Sci-Fi genres of art.
Please do not inclued plain Anthromorphs and their artists in your campain.

I do however like your drawing from an artistic view. I like the sword design and the blood splatter is well done.
Keep up with your drawing.

My reply.

"Furrys are, by definition, someone who dresses in a fur-suit or parts there of and acts as an animal, often in sexual situations, or who find the idea of animals or part-animals sexually stimulating."

A furry ,as a person, is a fan of anthropomorphic animal characters. Whether or not if that individual's fan obsession includes any amount of sexual overtones is irrelevant.

You may place yourself in a neutral position reguarding them, however your ignorance on the matter places you in a darker light than you would likely want to see your self.

"Please do not inclued plain Anthromorphs and their artists in your campain."
The artist's comments only mentioned furries in the context of anthropomorphic animal characters. What's the point of asking to exclude something that was never mentioned. I say go for it if you want. More power to you hippykiller1.

Their reply

Actually, the artist's comments did not specify anthromorphs. That was done by other commenting artists and most of their definitions were mis-quoted also.
If you look in the dictionary, the term "Furry" in this context, does specify the sexual nature. Now that may not completely hold true in real life, but I was basing my argument on dictionary deffinition.

Maybe your ignorance is showing.

My reply

"Actually, the artist's comments did not specify anthromorphs."

I thought I said that...
These are the "Artist's comments" I was refering to. If it helps any.

" Artist's Comments
These stupid animal things are everywhere. People draw them and put them on this site all to often. I say we take a stand against furries and kill them with everything we've got.

As you can see displayed in this picture is an orc I created. His name is Ssej, his purpose in life is to mutilate furries. And he has the tail of one of the more popular form of furries. FOX FURRIES!

Expect more of Ssej mutilating furries soon.

DESTROY FURRIES! "

"If you look in the dictionary, the term "Furry" in this context, does specify the sexual nature."

I honestly don't know what dictionary you're reading that speaks of the context of the artist's comments on a submission at deviantart. The comments (the descriptive text entered by the artist below the submission) never mention
anything sexual. Furries are only refered to as stupid animal things that people draw. Perhaps get your mind out of the gutter or get a new dictionary. And don't take this so seriously. I hope you understand I meant you no offense.

[ephemral]

 :umm: You do realize the artist is only talking about drawings and not fans of the drawings right?...

[FoxyMcCloud]

Oops. Oh well, as I said, "random spasm." I've been having a lot since a few days ago... Don't ask...

[Rhakshi]

that was really just,, dumb, i'd draw it with a lascannon :p
though for some reason I bet the guy who drew that lives in his mom's basment, idk why it just seems so.  Though Some people take this stuff way to seriously