The Furry Forums
Creative Arts and Media => Creative Writing => Topic started by: White Wolf Guardian on November 13, 2014, 05:57:32 PM
-
I completed my Geography research project today and I decided I liked it enough that I would actually post it. If you don't like it, I don't really care, because it's important to me :P
(It's way too long for a post, so I'm sending a link, no I don't actually care about writing my name or school on this *tips fedora*)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/jem06rkt8eb6i5f/WWG_PRJ.docx?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/jem06rkt8eb6i5f/WWG_PRJ.docx?dl=0) (Had to update it, the first draft was pretty bad)
I plan on posting some other projects here in the future as well.
-
Will have to look on real puts. Tablet failure.
*Plays 20th Century Fox theme*
-
I'm thinking about changing the name of this thread to TL;DR, with some lower case portions to make sure it's still okay :P
-
Lol, it's sort of like a dare XD
-
I got an A+ on my research project!
(http://i.imgur.com/YdmGHYG.gif)
-
Wow, I could not be more excited for you!! *hugs* Well at least that's what I thought til I saw that gif!
-
Now to show the other 2 A+'s I got, but didn't really talk about.
(Warning: Philosophy material)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/zyajw5307d2hkhi/Descartes%20Squares%20Plus%20One.docx?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/zyajw5307d2hkhi/Descartes%20Squares%20Plus%20One.docx?dl=0) (Rene Descartes Criticism)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kojt6b4ti2eznbd/Physicalism%20of%20Qualia.docx?dl=0 (https://www.dropbox.com/s/kojt6b4ti2eznbd/Physicalism%20of%20Qualia.docx?dl=0) (Frank Jackson Analysis and why "Physicalism" is the same thing as epiphenomenalism)
-
Oooh, look out! This is more my cup pf tea :D
*glares at silly work*
Might have to print them off to take away...
-
4 pages each, 1 source page. The source page is really just the single book I used with both of these works. My opinion is that if you used any outside sources with Frank Jackson's first opinion about epiphenomenalism, you would be guilty of cherry picking, because Jackson said in 2003 that everything he wrote in the first version was wrong. Would have been a bad idea, considering I had a 4 page limit.
-
Four pages is awful. I'd rather one or eight.
*noms four*