The Furry Forums
Furry Chat => General => Forum Games => Topic started by: MrRazot on July 08, 2012, 06:41:30 PM
-
4 teams and you choose which team you're on out of:
Good (0;10)
Evil (0;-10)
Lawful (10;0)
Chaotic (-10;0)
This game plays over the Cartesian Plain or a graph with the starting point for the "piece" being (0;0)
as a player you have to try get the "piece" to your "base" as indicated by the point of axis
basicly you have to make the co-ordinates of the "piece" equal to that of your "base"
Each Player gets a chance to move the piece once which involves changing the x and y of the "piece" by +1 or -1
you have to change both numbers that the piece is moving diagonally across the plain
Don't change teams please and let's try get someone on each team before we team up on each other :P
any questions?
Game start: The Piece is at (0;0)
-
(-1, 0)
Lets see what chaos we can start up in here
-
(-1; 1)
If the chaos does no harm.
-
remember you need to move diagonally :P
(0;0)
-
(-1, -1)
Seeing as Evil and Good are subjective, I can move up or down on the good/evil scale without changing my basic moral structure, so I might as well troll goody-two-shoes. :P
-
(-2;0)
seeing as I [kinda] back'd chaos, ill do it again.
but for da greata good an ting.
-
(-3, -1)
Chaos grows, but it seems good and evil are at a stalemate.
Latin semper sonat minaces. Google Vertere est bonum.
-
(-4,0)
I cant translate that.
@.@
-
(-5, -1)
Google Translate translated: Latin always sounds ominous. Google translate is great.
-
(-6;0)
I actually copied it over into Google translator. It gave me the same words with only 'sonat' made 'Soon'.
The thread is in dire need of Law-abiding Furs.
-
-5, 0
Law incoming.
-
(-6;1)
but is it good or evil law?
-
-5, 2
I didn't think you could choose two "sides".
-
(-6;3)
me neither, but you seemingly have to.
-
(-7, 2)
Chaos shall always triumph over order because it is better organised.
-
(-8;3)
Chaos being organised... okay.
-
(-9, 2)
Tis a quote, dear laddy...
-
(-8, 1)
Stop! You two have violated the law! >:3
Prepare to pay the courts a hefty fine~
-
(-7;0)
:P
-
(-6,1)
Stop right there, criminal scum!
-
for the greater good :D
(-5;0)
-
(-6, 1) FOR FREEDOM!
-
(-5,2)
The Paladins have arrived!
-
(-6;3)
Who?
-
(-7, 2)
Good is evil. By removing evil it prevents the growth of good. Evil is good. it promotes the growth of good.
-
(-6, 1)
I have a difficult time seeing an excess of evil as a good thing, but it is an interesting point
-
(-7, 0)
I find it is an interesting point. Rejoice Taoists, it seems you were right.
Also, its funny how chaos and evil are negatives in this game.
-
(-8; 1)
Nevertheless, I shall try keeping it from going into the dark side.
-
(-9, 0)
But you were supposed to bring balance to the force, young padawan.
-
(-10;1)
where will this chaotic world be without some good in it?
-
(-11, 0)
Good is only relative to the amount of evil present in the world. Without good, there can be no evil.
-
(-10, -1)
So what's left if we get rid of both concepts?
-
(-11, -2)
Rationality, of course. And this is what we have in the real world, too.
-
(-10, -3)
I see :o
Hadn't thought of it that way
-
(-11, -4)
I applaud myself for making people think in new ways. Lets all get a little Nietzschean.
-
(-10, -5)
I've been meaning to read more Nietzsche~
Anywho, looks like we're tipping into chaotic evil territory :o
-
(-11, -6)
Chaotic evil is a classic. Everybody wants some so their silly lawful good paladins can crush them ala "Mighty Wighty" style, only in moral composition this time.
-
(-10, -7)
Looks like things are pretty set for this moral war
-
(-11, -8)
It is good that evil should triumph. We evil-doers never get the good stuff in fiction.
-
(-10, -9)
Well every dog has his day so they say~ Don't see why we should not triumph
-
(-11,-10)
I'm surprised there are so few people for the side of order. Unusual.
-
(-12, -9)
Too... much evil...
may the numbers exceed 10?
-
Yes but it's rather silly to do so :P
(-11;-8)
-
(-12;-7)
'Good' to know.
-
(-11,-6)
As a good follower of rules, what are the bounds of this game? Does it just keep going until one aspect is positive / negative infinity?
It says we have to reach a 10 on the axes... but we've surpassed that I believe...
-
(-10;-5)
so going with the rules, we go till both reach -10/10 and stop there.
-
(-9,-4)
Well... technically... we have to reach a 10 that lies on one of the axes... Here's what the first post says:
Posts: 964
Gender:
Do speak up, I'm missing my left ear...
Species: Red Fox
Coloring: calm-orange
Height: 1,8m
Weight: 72Kg
Build: slim "rocker" build
Currently: To know more about behind the mask, click the oldest of the two
Moral Compass Game
« on: July 08, 2012, 12:41:30 »
Quote
4 teams and you choose which team you're on out of:
Good (0;10)
Evil (0;-10)
Lawful (10;0)
Chaotic (-10;0)
This game plays over the Cartesian Plain or a graph with the starting point for the "piece" being (0;0)
as a player you have to try get the "piece" to your "base" as indicated by the point of axis
basicly you have to make the co-ordinates of the "piece" equal to that of your "base"
So I guess we keep going until a 0 and a 10 appear?
-
(-8, -5)
Sounds about right!
-
Well then... FOR THE GLORY OF THE WHITE ROSE!!!
(-7,-4)
-
(-6, -5)
The white rose is so beautiful :)
The book, "Sophie Scholl and the White Rose" was also beautiful as well :'(
-
(-5,-4)
Was unaware of that book. I kinda lifted the name from a story >_>
Not that one and I don't remember which, but I remember reading it and thought it was a great name.
-
(-6, -5)
Chaotic evil has already triumphed. Rejoice!
-
(-5,-4)
Not true ZombiezuRFER! Your side never reached a number that was some combination of 10 and 0!
-
(-6, -4)
But it did reach the Chaotic evil corner, namely (-10, -10)
ALthough the actual position at the time was (-11, -10)
-
(-5,-3)
All I'm hearing is a long definition of "Chaotic evil almost won". The key word being almost... which means they didn't. :p
-
(-6, -4)
Chaotic evil did indeed win, because it got past the required (-10, -10)
-
(-5,-3)
But the point of the game isn't to exceed the point... the point of the game is to arrive at the point. I'm still hearing chaotic evil almost won...
XP
-
(-6, -4)
I suppose we shall see in the morning.
Join Chaotic Evil.
(http://www.woosk.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/evil.jpg)
-
(-5, -5)
Sorry, that's against my alignment XD
-
(-4,-4)
Mine as well. Although I commend your picture.
-
(-3, -3)
Lets get back to neutral.
Boring old neutral :D
-
(-2, -4)
Sorry to burst your bubble, but that will not be happening
-
(-1,-3)
Neutral isn't boring... it' just... undefined.
-
(-2;2)
After passing undefined neutral, where shall we wander next?
I vote Chaotic good :P
-
(-1,-1)
Nay! Lawful Good shall triumph at this rate! ONWARD TO (10,10)!
-
(-2, -2)
Chaotic Evil rejoins the fray.
-
(-1, -3)
Lawful evil calling in X3
-
(0,-2)
I'm surprised at you Sig... switching sides...
-
(1, -3)
Well circumstances called for a change of allegiance~ >:3
-
(-0, -4)
Evil is quite firm here now.
-
(1, -3)
NEVAH I SHALL NOT ALLOW IT!
-
(2, -4)
I shan't argue with it~
-
(1, -3)
I repeat: NOOOOOO
-
(0, -4)
Chaotic good now? Change is chaos, order is stagnancy. Welcome to the chaotic side.
-
(1, -3)
Oh dear... I messed up my number... meant to set it to three... I was so used to decreasing the count because of the negatives. Derp.
-
(0, -2)
We must go chaotic good... because Chaotic evil is so overrated.
-
(1,-1)
I can live with choatic good... but law is just too good!
-
(0,0)
Well sir, We just returned the piece to the point of origin...
-
(-1;1)
so onward we go again!
-
(0,2)
As much as I appreciate the "good" guys coming out of the woodwork now... LAW!
-
(-1;3)
I want to be Lawful, but I unknowingly sided with Chaotic in the beginning.
-
(0,4)
I see... well, at least (at this rate), Neutral Good will win here in another 6 posts or so...
-
(-1;5)
woop! go Good!
-
(0,6)
yay patterns!
-
(-1, 5)
Crap! The goody-twoshoes are winning!
-
(0,6)
resetting number...
-
(-1;7)
do evil people only wear 1 shoe?
-
(0,8)
I can't imagine why they would...
-
(-1;9)
goody-2-shoes.
evil-2-shoes?
or is it just for the Rhythm ?
-
(0,10)
It's probably the rthym.
So what now? We've reached a number lying on the axes with a combination of 0 and / or ten.
-
(-1;10)
we reach an impasse. i think.
well, i have to go to sleep now, so goodnight.
-
(0,9)
Stop making the piece evil!!
-
(-1, 8)
In the name of the inderterminable untestable deity whom I do not acknowledge the existence of!
-
(0,7)
In the name of lulz!
-
(-1, 7)
Certainly, lets lulz all the time.
-
(0,6)
But let's skip the evil lulz...
-
(-1, 5)
But evil is a force fr good, for without evil, there can be no good.
Also, join chaotic evil. Do it fur teh lulz.
(http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn189/Saibrock/motivator9704878.jpg)
-
(0, 4)
Lawful evil has more benefits. Staying within the law and still getting everything you want~
-
(1, 3)
Yay, a point for good :D
-
(2, 2)
Law is on an upward trend while good grows smaller
-
(1, 3)
Oh fudge... I got the order wrong...
-
(2, 2)
I keep getting mixed up too XD
-
(1, 1)
*evil laugh*
I manipulated you Chrono! Mwahahahaha!
Evil to the bitten end >:3
-
(0,2)
To the bitten end... I guess being evil causes a person to mix up their idioms...
-
(-1, 1)
No, I meant it literally. Having bitten my tongue, that is where I will be chaotic evil to.
-
(0, 0)
Would ya look at that! Back where we started XD
-
(-1, -1)
And now we dwell in chaotic evil territory.
Oh man, I still can't get over how easy chrono was. People with delusions of good are so easy to make evil... *evil chuckle*
-
(0, -2)
Corruption is apparently not a hard thing to do :o
-
(-1, -3)
Why, corruption is the only logical answer even. If knowledge is power and power corrupts, then no hero can learn the villains plans without becoming evil himself... >:3
-
(0, -4)
The dark side of the hero? Fun :D
-
(-1, -5)
The most fun, of course.
-
(0, -6)
Tipping into the side of evil here
-
(-1, -7)
And Evil yet prevails.
-
(0, -8)
Oh wow! Still no resistance!
-
(-1, -9)
Nor shall there be soon. I have foretold it.
-
(-2, -8)
Well it would happen eventually, otherwise the game dies...
-
(-3, -9)
Luckily for me, the word and meaning of soon is subective.
-
(-2, -10)
We are now in evil territory again
-
(-3, -11)
I don't know why you choose lawful evil. Could you enlighten me?
-
(-2, -12)
Mostly because I noticed it was a minority so I wanted to make things more interesting X3 It's also an interesting if conflicted alignment. I'm evil, but I have a certain code I stick to. Just kind of a cool villain in my opinion
-
(-3, -13)
You wanna keep going until we hit irredeemably evil?
-
(-4;-12)
Viva La Resistance!
-
(-5, -13)
Perfect, Chaotic evil is set to win again... *evil chortle*
-
(-4, -14)
This is an issue because it is breaking the laws!
-
(-5, -15)
The only laws to follow are those of physics. Saor Alba Gu Brath!
-
(-6;-14)
what?
-
(-8, -15)
It means "Free Scotland Forever."
-
(-8;-14)
oh.
I gets it
-
(-9, -13)
-
(-10, -14)
Chaotic Evil Wins again!
*evil guffaw*
-
(-9, -15)
I AM THE LAWWWW
-
Apparently the evil Law D:
(-8, -14)
The chaos is evil! Oh dear why! D:
-
(-7, -15)
Come! Join us, Anoni or I shall slap a hefty fine on your tail!
-
(-6, -16)
Isn't there a song named Irredeemable?
-
(-5, -17)
I believe there is :o
-
(-6, -18)
What was Adam Jensen's moral alignment?
-
(-7;-17)
he never asked to have one.
:P
-
(-8, -18)
I'm guessing he was chaotic neutral?
-
(-9;-17)
could be. I played it looong ago
-
(-10, -18)
Aaaaand we're back to chaotic evil.
-
Why have people chosen to be evil? :P
(-11, -17)
-
(-12, -18)
The Purest of Chaotic Evil.
-
(-13, -17)
But there can be good in the chaos!
-
(-14, -18)
First, define "good."
-
(-15, -17)
Beneficial for a majority of mankind to achieve a greater standard of living.
-
(-16, -18)
Now I ask: What is evil?
-
(-17, -17)
The opposite, an act that would negatively effect Man kinds standard of living
-
(-18, -18)
Now, what is negative or beneficial?
-
(-18, -17)
A "good" act is an act that causes someone more happiness than they had initially.
An "evil" act is an act that causes someone less happiness than they had initially.
-
(-19, -18)
What if they were philosophical zombies?
-
(-20, -17)
We're not philosophical zombies.
Thus the realms of good and evil apply to this situation.
-
Howzit?
You know that bringing it out isn't really helping your morality win :P
(-19;-16)
-
(-20, -15)
I want good chaos :P
-
(-20, -16)
But how can you be sure your not surrounded by philosophical zombies then?
-
Well you still want a 0 in there :P
(-19;-14)
-
(-18, -13)
Actually yeah, maybe a neutral-neutral might be the best way to go.
Back to the origin I go!
-
(-19, -14)
One man's evil is another man's good.
-
Logic :P
(-17;-12)
-
(-17, -11)
You skipped a bit there.
Yes, that's why the terms good and evil are redundant, one mans evil can be another mans good, one mans good can be another mans evil.
So that's why I'm heading for (0, 0) there is no good or evil :P
-
(-18, -12)
Indeed.
-
Don't mind me, but I just think it silly that you've all somehow gone past -10 :P
-
(-17, -11)
ZombiezuRFER! We can go beyond the concepts of emotion and fantasy, to only think of logic! Join me into the land of neutrality and together we will prosper unbounded by morality and social structure! Post closer to (0, 0)
And you MrRazot have yet to update the thread title :P
-
(-18, -12)
Oh but I am using logic. Being "evil" is funny, therefore, I enjoy it. XP
-
Am I? :P
Also it's not evil until it gets to the evil point :P
-
(-19, -13)
I have manipulated Mr. Razot and his lack of piece movement! *evil chuckle*
-
(0;0)
BLAM!!!
Jk
(-18;-12)