The Furry Forums

Furry Chat => General => Topic started by: ephemral on May 21, 2007, 02:15:31 AM

Title: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on May 21, 2007, 02:15:31 AM
I figured I'd make one of these and share it.



(http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n121/shipanda/deck9442686.jpg)

Make one and let us see it.
http://bighugelabs.com/flickr/deck.php
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: WingedZephyr on May 24, 2007, 01:49:26 AM
I was bored, so I figured, what the heck, I'll give it a go.  :P

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v629/magicalcow17/deck7645965.jpg)
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on May 24, 2007, 03:46:18 AM
(http://userimages.imvu.com/userdata/05/32/58/62/userpics/fusion_card_0.jpg)
Yay for the DBZ reference.  :vegeta:

...Never mind the grammar slip...
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: WingedZephyr on May 24, 2007, 04:14:02 AM

...Never mind the grammar slip...


*pokes the misplaced apostrophe*  :snicker:

Just playing. You made nice cards, eph.  :)
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on May 24, 2007, 04:24:36 AM
Yeh, but the apostrphe was correct. It was the extra word "the" inbetween "it's printed damage to" and "this attack.". :snicker:
I have to be technical some times even if it's understood it's not needed or something was intentional.

Thanks anyways. :P
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: WingedZephyr on May 24, 2007, 05:04:58 AM
"It's" is a contraction of "it is." "Its" shows possession. And I did notice the extra word too.  :P
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on May 24, 2007, 05:42:16 AM
Yep, You're right you are.
Strange how that's the one exception.
Looking back though, I could have just as easily also forgot to add in quotation marks before "it's" and after "damage".
That would then make it mean you are to add the words "it's printed damage" to the attack. That would make sense, but
really wouldn't fit in unless you were adding "keywords". Something a card effect would refer to.

I should make more of an effort to remember that rule about it's and its from now on. And ...hey. No spell checker anymore.
I guess I'll finaly have to update firefox on this computer then.
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: WingedZephyr on May 24, 2007, 05:50:58 AM
Just a little grammar lesson for the day.  ^_^V

But anyway, I don't want to get too off-topic, so~... Anyone else going to make any cards?  :sniffle:
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on May 24, 2007, 11:38:08 PM
I recently made this one. If I hadn't changed the weight I could use this one as a proxy.

(http://userimages.imvu.com/userdata/05/32/58/62/userpics/polaris_ukyo_0.jpg)
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: WingedZephyr on May 25, 2007, 05:34:25 AM
Oooo, that one's pretty.  :sparkle:
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: Tator_dog on June 02, 2007, 03:17:39 PM
Bannana power
Title: Re: Trading cards
Post by: ephemral on June 02, 2007, 03:23:33 PM
Interesting card. Although the grammar and redundancy could be fixed.
Perhaps it should read something like.

"Discard three monsters to draw three cards."

It's a nice ability.